There are five STSMs foreseen this time. Dead line for applying is the end of August.
Link to the call text: https://enresshcost.eu/stsm/
Please, feel free to spread this information.
Do not hesitate to ask Mimi Urbanc if you have further questions.
The ‘Prague Manifesto’, the ENRESSH position paper on SSH research evaluation, is now available: Evaluation_of_SSH_final
This major position paper grew from discussions during the Stakeholder meeting in Prague in January 2017. Since then, the ex-manifesto has undergone much discussion, and became a series of recommendations for improving evaluation protocols in the SSH. Based on the observation of best practices, the paper does not promote any national system in particular, but intends to underline principles which need to be taken into consideration when designing and applying evaluation protocols for the SSH. Offering an extended version is one of the mail aims of the Action.
The International Publishers Association has issued an important manifesto on the Freedom to Publish. At a time when academic freedom is under attack even within Europe, reiterating the right to publish is vital. No publication, no evaluation.
https://www.internationalpublishers.org/freedom-to-publish/ipa-freedom-to-publish-manifesto
Research Evaluation (OUP) has just published the paper “Scholarly book publishing: its information sources for evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities” by Elea Giménez-Toledo, Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez & Gunnar Sivertsen:
Members of WG3 have recently published a freely downloadable paper on databases in Flanders:
Verleysen, F.T. & Rousseau R. (2017). How the existence of a regional bibliographic information system can help evaluators to conform to the principles of the Leiden Manifesto. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 54(1), http://joemls.dils.tku.edu.tw/detail.php?articleId=54154&lang=en
Mimi Urbanc, ENRESSH STMS manager, has announced the second call for STMS. There are five STSMs foreseen this time. Dead line for applying is the end of April.
Link to the call text: https://enresshcost.eu/stsm/
A paper co-authored by ENRESSH Vice-Chair Jack Spaapen has been published in Research Professional to coincide with the recent Leru report on social impact. ‘Impact agenda gains elite support’ can be read here: http://www.researchresearch.com/news/article/?articleId=1367044
The Leru report is available on their website at: http://www.leru.org/files/general/LERU_Position_Paper_Societal_Impact.pdf
In March 2017, Leru published a new report on Social Impact of research
http://www.leru.org/files/general/LERU_Position_Paper_Societal_Impact.pdf
Paul Benneworth, ENRESSH WG2 presented work from the ENRESSH STSM undertaken by Reetta Muhonen, co-supervised by Julia Olmos Peñuela and Paul Benneworth, and which was presented to the recent Sofia WG meeting
See here for full programme: http://www.sv.u
Other ENRESSH speakers included Leonie van Drooge on “Assessing the impact of the social sciences and humanities: the Dutch approach” and Jordi Molas-Gallaert speaking about “Assessing the impact of the social sciences and humanities: the SIAMPI approach”.
